<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Progress Report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.atomic-robo.com/2008/03/20/progress-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2008/03/20/progress-report/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 04:21:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2008/03/20/progress-report/comment-page-1/#comment-9276</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atomic-robo.com/?p=220#comment-9276</guid>
		<description>@Brandon: Something like &quot;Atomic Hobo&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brandon: Something like &#8220;Atomic Hobo&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Wegener &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Getcher War On</title>
		<link>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2008/03/20/progress-report/comment-page-1/#comment-4127</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Wegener &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Getcher War On</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 13:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atomic-robo.com/?p=220#comment-4127</guid>
		<description>[...] a progress report over at Atomic-Robo. Apparently there is at least one reviewer who is concerned that Robo is a one-trick pony, so Brian [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a progress report over at Atomic-Robo. Apparently there is at least one reviewer who is concerned that Robo is a one-trick pony, so Brian [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2008/03/20/progress-report/comment-page-1/#comment-4126</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 10:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atomic-robo.com/?p=220#comment-4126</guid>
		<description>http://www.vgcats.com/comics/?strip_id=16

The contents of that link pretty much sum up how I feel about IGN in any case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.vgcats.com/comics/?strip_id=16" rel="nofollow">http://www.vgcats.com/comics/?strip_id=16</a></p>
<p>The contents of that link pretty much sum up how I feel about IGN in any case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2008/03/20/progress-report/comment-page-1/#comment-11257</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 10:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atomic-robo.com/?p=220#comment-11257</guid>
		<description>http://www.vgcats.com/comics/?strip_id=16

The contents of that link pretty much sum up how I feel about IGN in any case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.vgcats.com/comics/?strip_id=16" rel="nofollow">http://www.vgcats.com/comics/?strip_id=16</a></p>
<p>The contents of that link pretty much sum up how I feel about IGN in any case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2008/03/20/progress-report/comment-page-1/#comment-4124</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 22:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atomic-robo.com/?p=220#comment-4124</guid>
		<description>LOL you can&#039;t go  week without an Atomic Age query, can you? We should just start putting big giant disclaimers on the back of all Atomic Robo TPBs -&quot;SORRY. NO ATOMIC AGE THIS YEAR. OR NEXT&gt;&quot;


As far as IGN goes -lets consider the source, shall we. There&#039;s nothing wrong with IGN per-say, but they are very mainstream and corporate. Robo&#039;s more of a fringe book. And all our past reviews from IGN have been grudgingly favorable -as if they don&#039;t want to admit we might not suck because we&#039;re a little Indie book from two guy&#039;s you&#039;ve never heard of before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL you can&#8217;t go  week without an Atomic Age query, can you? We should just start putting big giant disclaimers on the back of all Atomic Robo TPBs -&#8221;SORRY. NO ATOMIC AGE THIS YEAR. OR NEXT&gt;&#8221;</p>
<p>As far as IGN goes -lets consider the source, shall we. There&#8217;s nothing wrong with IGN per-say, but they are very mainstream and corporate. Robo&#8217;s more of a fringe book. And all our past reviews from IGN have been grudgingly favorable -as if they don&#8217;t want to admit we might not suck because we&#8217;re a little Indie book from two guy&#8217;s you&#8217;ve never heard of before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

